Meeting Minutes for
January 14, 2002
A meeting of the University Information Technology
Advisory Committee was called to order at 3:10 p.m. on January 14,
2002, in the 4th floor conference room of Cabell Library. Dr. Robert
Mattauch, co-chair, presided. Members present were Dr. Lynn Nelson,
Ms. Fran Smith, Dr. James Shultz, Mr. Carl Gattuso, Dr. Phyllis
Self, Mr. John Ulmschneider, and Mr. Mark Willis. Dr. Timothy Broderick,
Dr. David Sarrett, and Ms. Veronica Shuford were absent. Also present
were Mr. Bill Jones, Director of VCUnet, Mr. Bob Neale, Director
of the University Computer Center, and Mr. Jim Bostick, Director
of Web and Research Computing.
I. REVIEW AND APPROVAL
OF MINUTES FROM DECEMBER 10, 2001 MEETING
The following amendments were made:
1. The fourth paragraph under Item II – The first sentence
should be amended to include Audit and Management Services.
2. The fourth paragraph under Item II – In the second sentence,
Enforcement Document should be changed to VCU Computer and Network
Resources Use Policy.
The December 10 Minutes were approved as corrected.
Before proceeding with Item II on the agenda,
Dr. Mattauch requested that in the future, all documents being reviewed
by the Committee should include the date of the latest revision
in order to avoid confusion as to which version is the most current.
For instance, the date of the original document could be followed
by “.1” for the first revision, “.2” for
the second, etc.
He also suggested that all documents have electronic
versions available to committee members.
II. PROPOSED REVISIONS
TO INFORMATION SECURITY STANDARDS
Two documents, Server & Workstation Requirements and Firewall
and Filtering Policy, were introduced and discussed at the December
10th UITAC meeting. The documents were revised to incorporate changes
that were suggested at that meeting and returned to the committee
for approval. After review and discussion, a motion to adopt the
changes was made and seconded. There was no further discussion,
and the proposed standards were adopted unanimously.
III. PROPOSED WIRELESS
NETWORKING STANDARDS
Mr. Bill Jones, Director of VCUnet, presented an overview of the
proposed wireless networking standards to the committee and highlighted
the changes being proposed in Attachments 1, 2 and 3. The first
part of the document is mostly background information.
ATTACHMENT 1: ACCESS POINT
STANDARDS
These standards insure compatibility and state the minimum requirements
when acquiring an access point. A motion was made and seconded that
this section be approved. It passed unanimously.
ATTACHMENT 2: CLIENT CONFIGURATION
STANDARDS
This section details standards for the configuration of client PCs
to utilize wireless technologies. Since these requirements affect
only the individual user and not the network infrastructure, it
was suggested that they be proposed as guidelines rather than standards.
A motion was made and seconded that this section be approved. It
passed unanimously.
ATTACHMENT 3: CONDITIONS
OF USE FOR WIRELESS CONNECTIONS
This section explains the limitations of wireless technology and
states ways to protect valuable information and privacy. It is the
“policing” section. It states that anyone who wants
to use the wireless should abide by these rules.
The committee discussed this section at length.
Dr. Mattauch asked that each person, within two
weeks, provide suggestions regarding this standard to Ms. Barbie.
The suggestions will be compiled and sent out electronically to
the committee members. Action on this section was deferred until
the next committee meeting.
FOR INFORMATION:
I. E-MAIL MANAGEMENT ISSUES
Mr. Bob Neale, Director of the University Computer Center, attended
the meeting to talk about some of the issues regarding e-mail (user
message storage quotas, broadcast e-mail guidelines, and security,
virus protection, spam, etc.). There was general discussion that
the use of VCU e-mail accounts should be promoted, especially among
students.
Since there was not enough time to discuss the
issues of e-mail broadcast guidelines and spam, those issues were
put on hold until the next meeting.
II. IMPLICATIONS OF PATRIOT
ACT
A handout from an audio conference on the Patriot Act was distributed
and will be discussed at the next meeting.
There being no further
business, the meeting adjourned at 4:45 pm.
|