|
Among those movements which seem to be, now and then,
endemic in the public mind,--perhaps we should say, sporadic,--rather than the single inspiration of one mind, is
that which has urged on society the benefits of action having for its object a benefit to the position of Woman. And
none is more seriously interesting to every healthful and
thoughtful mind.
In that race which is now predominant over all the
other races of men, it was a cherished belief that women
had an oracular nature. They are more delicate than men,
--delicate as iodine to light,--and thus more impressionable. They are the best index of the coming hour. I share
this belief. I think their words are to be weighed; but it is
their inconsiderate word,--according to the rule--"take
their first advice, not their second:" as Coleridge was wont
to apply to a lady for her judgment in questions of taste,
and accept it; but when she added--"I think so, because"
--"Pardon me, madam," he said, "leave me to find out the
reasons for myself." In this sense, as more delicate mercuries of the imponderable and immaterial influences, what
they say and think is the shadow of coming events. Their
very dolls are indicative. Among our Norse ancestors,
Frigga was worshipped as the goddess of women. "Weirdes
all," said the Edda, "Frigga knoweth, though she telleth
them never." That is to say, all wisdoms Woman knows;
though she takes them for granted, and does not explain
them as discoveries, like the understanding of man. Men
remark figure: women always catch the expression. They
inspire by a look, and pass with us not so much by what
they say or do, as by their presence. They learn so fast and
convey the result so fast as to outrun the logic of their slow
brother and make his acquisitions poor. 'Tis their mood
and tone that is important. Does their mind misgive them,
or are they firm and cheerful? Tis a true report that things
are going ill or well. And any remarkable opinion or movement shared by woman will be the first sign of revolution.
Plate said, Women are the same as men in faculty, only
less in degree. But the general voice of mankind has
agreed that they have their own strength; that women are
strong by sentiment; that the same mental height which
their husbands attain by toil, they attain by sympathy with
their husbands. Man is the will, and Woman the sentiment.
In this ship of humanity, Will is the rudder, and Sentiment
the sail: when Woman affects to steer, the rudder is only a
masked sail. When women engage in any art or trade, it is
usually as a resource, not as a primary object. The life of
the affections is primary to them, so that there is usually no
employment or career which they will not with their own
applause and that of society quit for a suitable marriage.
And they give entirely to their affections, set their whole
fortune on the die, lose themselves eagerly in the glory of
their husbands and children. Man stands astonished at a
magnanimity he cannot pretend to. Mrs. Lucy Hutchinson, one of the heroines of the English Commonwealth,
who wrote the life of her husband, the Governor of Nottingham, says, "If he esteemed her at a higher rate than
she in herself could have deserved, he was the author of
that virtue he doted on, while she only reflected his own
glories upon him. All that she was, was him, while he was
hers, and all that she is now, at best, but his pale shade."
As for Plate's opinion, it is true that, up to recent
times, in no art or science, not in painting, poetry, or mu-
sic, have they produced a master-piece. Till the new education and larger opportunities of very modern times, this
position, with the fewest possible exceptions, has always
been true. Sappho, to be sure, in the Olympic Games,
gained the crown over Pindar. But, in general, no mastery
in either of the fine arts--which should, one would say, be
the arts of women--has yet been obtained by them, equal
to the mastery of men in the same. The part they play in
education, in the care of the young and the tuition of older
children, is their organic office in the world. So much sympathy as they have; makes them inestimable as the
mediators between those who have knowledge and those
who want it: besides, their fine organization, their taste,
and love of details, makes the knowledge they give better
in their hands.
But there is an art which is better than painting, poetry, music, or architecture,--better than botany, geology,
or any science; namely, Conversation. Wise, cultivated,
genial conversation is the last flower of civilization and the
best result which life has to offer us,--a cup for gods, which
has no repentance. Conversation is our account of ourselves. All we have, all we can, all we know, is brought into play, and as the reproduction, in finer form, of all our
havings.
Women are, by this and their social influence, the
civilizers of mankind. What is civilization? I answer, the
power of good women. It was Burns's remark when he first
came to Edinburgh that between the men of rustic life and
the polite world he observed little difference; that in the
former, though unpolished by fashion and unenlightened
by science, he had found much observation and much
intelligence; but a refined and accomplished woman was a
being almost new to him, and of which he had formed a
very inadequate idea. "I like women," said a clear-headed
man of the world, "they are so finished." They finish society, manners, language. Form and ceremony are their
realm. They embellish trifles. All these ceremonies that
hedge our life around are not to be despised, and when we
have become habituated to them cannot be dispensed
with. No woman can despise them with impunity. Their
genius delights in ceremonies, in forms, in decorating life
with manners, with proprieties, order and grace. They are,
in their nature, more relative; the circumstance must always fit; out of place they lose half their weight, out of place they are disfranchised. Position, Wren said, is essential to the perfecting of beauty;--a fine building is lost in a
dark lane; a statue should stand in the air; much more true
is it of woman.
We commonly say that easy circumstances seem somehow necessary to the finish of the female character: but then it is to be remembered that they create these with all
their might. They are always making that civilization
which they require; that state of art, of decoration, that
ornamental life in which they best appear.
The spiritual force of man is as much shown in taste, in his fancy and imagination--attaching deep meanings to things and to arbitrary inventions of no real value,--as in
his perception of truth. He is as much raised above the
beast by this creative faculty as by any other. The horse
and ox use no delays; they run to the river when thirsty, to
the corn when hungry, and say no thanks but fight down
whatever opposes their appetite. But man invents and
adorns all he does with delays and degrees, paints it all
over with forms, to please himself better; he invented majesty and the etiquette of courts and drawing-rooms; architecture, curtains, dress, all luxuries and adornments, and
the elegance of privacy, to increase the joys of society. He
invented marriage; and surrounded by religion, by comeliness, by all manner of dignities and renunciations, the union of the sexes.
And how should we better measure the gulf between the best intercourse of men in old Athens, in London, or in our American capitals,--between this and the hedgehog
existence of diggers of worms, and the eaters of clay and
offal,--than by signalizing just this department of taste or
comeliness? Herein woman is the prime genius and ordainer. There is no grace that is taught by the dancing-master, no style adopted into the etiquette of courts, but
was first the whim and mere action of some brilliant
woman, who charmed beholders by this new expression,
and made it remembered and copied. And I think they
should magnify their ritual of manners. Society, conversation, decorum, flowers, dances, colors, fonts, are their homes and attendants. They should be found in fit sur-
roundings-with fair approaches, with agreeable architecture, and with all advantages which the means of man collect:
"The far-fetched diamond finds its home
Flashing and smouldering in her hair.
For her the seas their pearls reveal,
Art and strange lands her pomp supply
With purple, chrome and cochineal,
Ochre and lapis lazuli.
The worm its golden woof presents.
Whatever runs, flies, dives or delves
s
All doff for her their ornaments,
Which suit her better than themselves."
There is no gift of nature without some drawback. So, to women, this exquisite structure could not exist without its own penalty. More vulnerable, more infirm, more mortal than men, they could not be such excellent artists in this element of fancy if they did not lend and give themselves to it. They are poets who believe their own poetry. They emit from their pores a colored atmosphere, one would say, wave upon wave of rosy light, in which they walk
evermore, and see all objects through this warm-tinted mist that envelops them.
But the starry crown of woman is in the power of her affection and sentiment, and the infinite enlargements to which they lead. Beautiful is the passion of love, painter
and adorner of youth and early life: but who suspects, in its
blushes and tremors, what tragedies, heroisms and immortalities are beyond it? The passion, with all its grace and poetry, is profane to that which follows it. All these affections are only introductory to that which is beyond, and to that which is sublime.
We men have no right to say it, but the omnipotence of Eve is in humility. The instincts of mankind have drawn the Virgin Mother--
"Created beings all in lowliness
Surpassing, as in height above them all."
This is the Divine Person whom Dante and Milton saw in vision. This is the victory of Griselda, her supreme humility. And it is when love has reached this height that all
our pretty rhetoric begins to have meaning. When we see that, it adds to the soul a new soul, it is honey in the mouth, music in the ear and balsam in the heart.
"Far have I clambered in my mind,
But nought so great as Love I find.
What is thy tent, where dost thou dwell?
'My mansion is humility,
Heaven's vastest capability.'
The further it doth downward tend,
The higher up it doth ascend."
The first thing men think of, when they love, is to exhibit their usefulness and advantages to the object of their affection. Women make light of these, asking only
love. They wish it to be an exchange of nobleness.
There is much in their nature, much in their social position which gives them a certain power of divination. And women know, at first sight, the characters of those with whom they converse. There is much that tends to give them a religious height which men do not attain.
Their sequestration from affairs and from the injury to the moral sense which affairs often inflict, aids this. And in every remarkable religious development in the world,
women have taken a leading part. It is very curious that in the East, where Woman occupies, nationally, a lower sphere, where the laws resist the education and emancipation of women,--in the Mohammedan faith, Woman yet occupies the same leading position, as a prophetess, that
she has among the ancient Greeks, or among the Hebrews, or among the Saxons. This power, this religious character, is everywhere to be remarked in them.
The action of society is progressive. In barbarous society the position of women is always low--in the Eastern nations lower than in the West. "When a daughter is born," says the Shiking, the old Sacred Book of China, "she sleeps on the ground, she is clothed with a wrapper, she plays with a tile; she is incapable of evil or of good." and something like that position, in all low society, is the position of woman; because, as before remarked, she is herself its civilizer. With the advancements of society the position and influence of woman bring her strength or her faults into light. In modern times, three or four conspicuous instrumentalities may be marked. After the deification of Woman in the Catholic Church, in the sixteenth or seventeenth century,when her religious nature gave her, of
course, new importance,--the Quakers have the honor of having first established, in their discipline, the equality in the sexes. It is even more perfect in the later sect of the
Shakers, wherein no business is broached or counselled without the intervention of one elder and one elderess.
A second epoch for Woman was in France,--entirely civil; the change of sentiment from a rude to a polite character, in the age of Louis XIV,--commonly dated from the building of the Hôtel de Rambouillet. I think another important step was made by the doctrine of Swedenborg, a sublime genius who gave a scientific exposition of the part played severally by man and woman in the world, and showed the difference of sex to run through nature and
through thought. Of all Christian sects this is at this moment the most vital and aggressive.
Another step was the effect of the action of the age in the antagonism to Slavery. It was easy to enlist Woman in this; it was impossible not to enlist her. But that Cause
turned out to be a great scholar. He was a terrible metaphysician. He was a jurist, a poet, a divine. Was never a University of Oxford or Göttingen that made such students. It took a man from the plough and made him acute, eloquent, and wise, to the silencing of the doctors. There was nothing it did not pry into, no right it did not explore, no wrong it did not expose. And it has, among its other effects, given Woman a feeling of public duty and an added self-respect.
One truth leads in another by the hand; one right is an accession of strength to take more. And the times are marked by the new attitude of Woman; urging, by argument and by association, her rights of all kinds, in short, to one-half of the world;--as the right to education, to avenues of employment, to equal rights of property, to equal rights in marriage, to the exercise of the professions and of suffrage.
Of course; this conspicuousness had its inconveniences. But it is cheap wit that has been spent on this subject; from Aristophanes, in whose comedies I confess
my dulness to find good joke, to Rabelais, in whom it is monstrous exaggeration of temperament, and not borne out by anything in nature,--down to English Comedy,
and, in our day, to Tennyson, and the American newspapers. In all, the body of the joke is one, namely, to charge women with temperament; to describe them as victims of
temperament; and is identical with Mahomet's opinion that women have not a sufficient moral or intellectual force to control the perturbations of their physical structure. These were all drawings of morbid anatomy, and such satire as might be written on the tenants of a hospital or on an asylum for idiots. Of course it would be easy for women to retaliate in kind, by painting men from the dogs and gorillas that have worn our shape. That they have not, is an eulogy on their taste and self-respect. The good easy
world took the joke which it liked. There is always the want of thought; there is always credulity. There are plenty of people who believe women to be incapable of anything but to cook, incapable of interest in affairs. There are plenty of people who believe that the world is governed by men of dark complexions, that affairs are only directed by such, and do not see the use of contemplative men, or how ignoble would be the world that wanted
them. And so without the affection of women.
But for the general charge: no doubt it is wellfounded. They are victims of the finer temperament. They have tears, and gaieties, and faintings, and glooms, and devotion
to trifles. Nature's end, of maternity for twenty years, was of so supreme importance that it was to be secured at all events, even to the sacrifice of the highest beauty. They
are more personal. Men taunt them that, whatever they do, say, read or write, they are thinking of themselves and their set. Men are not to the same degree temperamented,
for there are multitudes of men who live to objects quite out of them, as to politics, to trade, to letters or an art, unhindered by any influence of constitution.
The answer that lies, silent or spoken, in the minds of well-meaning persons, to the new claims, is this: that, though their mathematical justice is not to be denied, yet
the best women do not wish those things; they are asked for by people who intellectually seek them, but who have not the support or sympathy of the truest women; and
that, if the laws and customs were modified in the manner proposed, it would embarrass and pain gentle and lovely persons with duties which they would find irksome and
i distasteful. Very likely. Providence is always surprising us with new and unlikely instruments. But perhaps it is because these people have been deprived of education, fine
companions, opportunities, such as they wished,--because
they feel the same rudeness and disadvantage which offends you,--that they have been stung to say, "It is too late for us to be polished and fashioned into beauty, but, at
least, we will see that the whole race of women shall not suffer as we have suffered."
They have an unquestionable right to their own property. And if a woman demand votes, offices and political equality with men, as among the Shakers an Elder and
Elderess are of equal power,--and among the Quakers,--it must not be refused. It is very cheap wit that finds it so droll that a woman should vote. Educate and refine society
to the highest point,--bring together a cultivated society of both sexes, in a drawing-room, and consult and decide by voices on a question of taste or on a question of right,
and is there any absurdity or any practical difficulty in obtaining their authentic opinions? If not, then there need be none in a hundred companies, if you educate them and
accustom them to judge. And, for the effect of it; I can say, for one, that all my points would sooner be carried in the state if women voted. On the questions that are important;
--whether the government shall be in one person, or whether representative, or whether democratic; whether men shall be holden in bondage, or shall be roasted alive and eaten, as in Typee, or shall be hunted with bloodhounds, as in this country; whether men shall be hanged for stealing, or hanged at all; whether the unlimited sale of cheap liquors shall be allowed;--they would give, I suppose, as intelligent a vote as the voters of Boston or New
York.
We may ask, to be sure,--Why need you vote? If new power is here, of a character which solves old tough questions, which puts me and all the rest in the wrong, tries and
condemns our religion, customs, laws, and opens new careers to our young receptive men and women, you can well leave voting to the old dead people. Those whom you teach, and those whom you half teach, will fast enough make themselves considered and strong with their new
insight and votes will follow from all the dull.
The objection to their voting is the same as is urged, in the lobbies of legislatures, against clergymen who take an active part in politics;--that if they are good clergymen
they are unacquainted with the expediencies of politics, and if they become good politicians they are worse clergymen. So of women, that they cannot enter this arena with-
out being contaminated and unsexed.
Here are two or three objections; first, a want of practical wisdom; second, a too purely ideal view; and, third, danger of contamination. For their want of intimate knowledge of affairs, I do not think this ought to disqualify them from voting at any town-meeting which I ever attended. I could heartily wish the objection were sound. But if any man will take the trouble to see how our people vote,--how many gentlemen are willing to take on themselves the trouble of thinking and determining for you, and, standing at the door of the polls, give every innocent citizen his ticket as he comes in, informing him that this is
the vote of his party; and how the innocent citizen, without further demur; goes and drops it in the ballot-box, I cannot but think he will agree that most women might vote as wisely.
For the other point, of their not knowing the world, and aiming at abstract right without allowance for circumstances,--that is not a disqualification, but a qualification.
Human society is made up of partialities. Each citizen has an interest and a view of his own, which, if followed out to the extreme, would leave no room for any other citizen.
One man is timid and another rash; one would change nothing, and the other is pleased with nothing; one wishes schools, another armies, one gunboats, another public gardens. Bring all these biases together and something is done in favor of them all.
Every one is a half vote, but the next elector behind him brings the other or corresponding half in his hand: a reasonable result is had. Now there is no lack, I am sure, of
the expediency, or of the interests of trade or of imperative class-interests being neglected. There is no lack of votes representing the physical wants; and if in your city the uneducated emigrant vote numbers thousands, representing a brutal ignorance and mere animal wants, it is to be corrected by an educated and religious vote, representing
the wants and desires of honest and refined persons. If the wants, the passions, the vices, are allowed a full vote through the hands of a half-brutal intemperate population, I think it but fair that the virtues, the aspirations should be allowed a full vote, as an offset, through the purest part of the people.
As for the unsexing and contamination,--that only accuses our existing politics, shows how barbarous we are,--that our policies are so crooked, made up of things not to be spoken, to be understood only by wink and nudge; this man to be coaxed, that man to be bought, and that other to be duped. It is easy to see that there is contamination enough, but it rots the men now, and fills the air with stench. Come out of that: it is like a dance-cellar. The
fairest names in this country in literature, in law, have gone into Congress and come out dishonored. And when I read the list of men of intellect, of refined pursuits, giants
in law, or eminent scholars, or of social distinction, leading men of wealth and enterprise in the commercial community, and see what they have voted for and suffered to be voted for, I think no community was ever so politely and elegantly betrayed.
I do not think it yet appears that women wish this equal share in public affairs. But it is they and not we that are to determine it. Let the laws be purged of every barbarous remainder, every barbarous impediment to women. Let the public donations for education be equally shared by them, let them enter a school as freely as a church, let them have and hold and give their property as men do theirs;--and in a few years it will easily appear whether they wish a voice in making the laws that are to govern them. If you do refuse them a vote, you will also refuse to tax them,--according to our Teutonic principle, No representation, no tax.
All events of history are to be regarded as growths and offshoots of the expanding mind of the race, and this appearance of new opinions, their currency and force in many minds, is itself the wonderful fact. For whatever is popular is important, shows the spontaneous sense of the hour. The aspiration of this century will be the code of the next. It holds of high and distant causes, of the same influences that make the sun and moon. When new opinions
appear, they will be entertained and respected, by every fair mind, according to their reasonableness, and not according to their convenience, or their fitness to shock our
customs. But let us deal with them greatly; let them make their way by the upper road, and not by the way of manufacturing public opinion, which lapses continually into expediency, and makes charlatans. All that is spontaneous is irresistible, and forever it is individual force that interests. I need not repeat to you,--your own solitude will suggest it,--that a masculine woman is not strong, but a lady is. The loneliest thought, the purest prayer, is rushing to be the history of a thousand years.
Let us have the true woman, the adorner, the hospitable, the religious heart, and no lawyer need be called in to write stipulations, the cunning clauses of provision, the strong investitures;--for woman moulds the lawgiver and writes the law. But I ought to say, I think it impossible to separate the interests and education of the sexes. Improve and refine the men, and you do the same by the women, whether you will or not. Every woman being the wife or the daughter of a man,--wife, daughter, sister, mother, of a man, she can never be very far from his ear, never not of his counsel, if she has really something to urge that is good
in itself and agreeable to nature. Slavery it is that makes slavery; freedom, freedom. The slavery of women happened when the men were slaves of kings. The melioration of manners brought their melioration of course. It could not be otherwise, and hence the new desire of better laws.
For there are always a certain number of passionately loving fathers, brothers, husbands, and sons who put their might into the endeavor to make a daughter, a wife, or a mother happy in the way that suits best. Woman should find in man her guardian. Silently she looks for that, and when she finds that he is not, as she instantly does, she betakes her to her own defences, and does the best she can. But when he is her guardian, fulfilled with all nobleness, knows and accepts his duties as her brother, all goes well for both.
The new movement is only a tide shared by the spirits of man and woman; and you may proceed in the faith that whatever the woman's heart is prompted to desire, the man's mind is simultaneously prompted to accomplish.
[Collected Works]
Related Criticism:
- Gougeon, Len. "Emerson and the Woman Question: The Evolution of His Thought." NEQ 71 (1998): 570-92.
- Gilbert, Armida. "'Pierced by the Thorns of Reform': Emerson on Womanhood." in The Emerson Dilemma (2001), pp. 93-114.
- Gilbert, Armida. "Emerson in the Context of the Woman's Rights Movement." Historical Guide to Ralph Waldo Emerson, 211-49.
|
